2015-11-21

Curly Braces

One of the great macro-typography inventions of the first 100 years of western printing was the curly brace (or bracket) as a device to organize hierarchical information. Initially the letterpress type-piece for a brace seems to have been cut ad-hoc by hand, as in this single example in the Margarita Philosophica of Gregor Reisch (1503):

In some work, such as grammar texts, the brace could soon be taken as read and simply omitted, as in a 1533 printing in Basle, Switzerland of the grammar of Donatus edited by Heinrich Loriti or "Glarean". But the normal procedure was for the typesetter to make a brace for such layouts.

Where the material in the stemma was more copious, printers laid it out with its root at the top. In a 1540 Basle printing of Livy's Decades in the edition of Glarean, the brace is still hand-cut:

Printers soon recognized it was quicker to resort to their typecases, combining the small pieces of straight rule and rounded corners supplied by their typecutters to form braces.

The first explicit explanation of this practice which I can find appears 200 years later in The Printer's Grammar by John Smith (link goes to a full edition of 1787, but the original seems to have come out 1755). It explains how a printer mainly resorts to his middle-length rules to do this:
Middle and Corners are very convenient in Genealogical Work, where they are used the flat way; and where the directing point is not always in the middle, but has its place under the name of the Parent, whose offspring stands between Corner and Corner of the bracing side, in order of primogeniture.
The "directing point" was a specially cut form to be found in the standard typesets in Basle. We see this in a 1557 example of a book by Wolfgang Lazius (1514-1565) (biography) in De gentium aliquot ... (online), page 589:

Elsewhere the point might be made from two corners, as in this 1556 book of genealogies (online) by Ernst Brotuff (1497-1565) (nasty biography) printed at Leipzig, Germany, where if one looks carefully, the joins between the rules are visible:

Sometimes the brace was reduced to a minimum as in a 1559 example. As another option, Johannes Herold (1514-1567), who was a publisher in Basle (biography), often preferred stemmata with the root at the left, as we see in his 1561 Churfürstliches Haus der Pfaltz an Rhein (online). Here too one can see that these braces were not hand cut, but assembled from smaller parts:

The curly brace was thus the printers' most important instrument in adapting the ancient graphic idea of the stemma to the technology of the printing press, where the need to square the forms that will be put into the type-bed presupposes that all elements fit together at 90-degree angles. When Leonhard Ostein of Basle came to print Hulderic Zwingli junior's edition of the Compendium of Petrus Pictaviensis in 1592 (previous blog post), he could hardly do otherwise:

Later tabular printing including some braces has been listed by an interesting Munich project, Historische Tabellenwerke (ended 2007), but I am not aware of any research on braced stemmata in incunables. What I am currently trying to do is take this history back beyond 1500. It is plain that the solutions then in use were not experimental, but settled practices. Can anyone help me find older examples?

2015-11-14

Arbor and Incest

Medieval canon law built up elaborate rules prohibiting marriage within kin groups. The principles of this were taught with a diagram known as the arbor juris, the first forms of which are classical in origin. The 64 uploads to Digita Vaticana on November 11, 2015 include Urb.lat.160, a mid-14th-century manuscript of decretals or codified canon law preceded by a particularly colourful arbor juris.

This class of diagrams was very comprehensively studied 1973-1982 by Hermann Schadt, who ordered the main group known as the arbores consanguinatis into seven main types. Urb.lat.160 contains the seventh of these types and was designed in the Decretum Gratiani (pars II, causa 35, qu. 5), a collection of canon law compiled in the 12th century by a jurist who is known as Gratian. At first it condemned a very wide range of potential marriages (some of the 14th degree by the classical Roman method of counting), but its scope was reduced in 1215.

I have compiled a "missing manual" to Schadt's  magisterial but not very reader-friendly book, and from it comes the following schematic. It shows the post-1215 form of Typ 7. Each roundel describes a relationship which was an impediment to marriage. The pink roundels in this matrix mark the kin relationships counted as third degree by the classical method:
The newly digitized manuscript contains miniatures which are probably genuine work of Nicolò da Bologna (see Italian biography). As Schadt explains, the Typ 7 diagrams developed an interesting iconography: an elderly man, perhaps representing the jurist, held the matrix in front of him as if it were a wooden placard. Tree branches grew to his left and his right, in his grasp. The Nicolò versions of these generally have six busts on the margin, male on the left, female on the right, apparently representing three generations of persons reacting with disappointment to the news that their love object is out of bounds.

The manuscript's arbor consanguinatis is followed by an arbor affinitatis, a large invariant type, which lists the in-laws that a person was also forbidden to wed. Schadt discusses this arbor on p. 276 of his book comparing it to other manuscripts. He notes the miniature's finely drawn depiction of Adam and Eve eating the forbidden fruit and then being expelled from Paradise by an angel:

Here is the full list of the new uploads:
  1. Arch.Cap.S.Pietro.B.79, liturgical music. Aaron Macks (comment below) points out it is one of the few manuscripts of "Old Roman" chant. More details at Waterloo.
  2. Arch.Cap.S.Pietro.D.194, Postillae on Old Testament, Nicholas of Lyra
  3. Arch.Cap.S.Pietro.E.26, mould ravaged Rufinus, Historia Monachorum
  4. Arch.Cap.S.Pietro.E.28, Plutarch Lives, in Latin translation by Jacobus Angelus
  5. Arch.Cap.S.Pietro.E.30, Justinus, Universal History
  6. Barb.lat.3912, poetry of Luigi Pulci
  7. Borg.ar.95, Four Gospels in Arabic, 8th century?
  8. Borg.cin.507, a beautiful map in Italian of the Qinqhai region of China
  9. Borg.copt.109.cass.XII.fasc.41, three folios in Coptic from Matthew 16-18 with marginal illuminations
  10. Borg.pers.19, Gospels in Persian, 14th century
  11. Cappon.103,
  12. Cappon.140,
  13. Cappon.239,
  14. Cappon.281.pt.2,
  15. Cappon.291.pt.2,
  16. Urb.lat.14, Postillae of Nicholas of Lyra on Genesis, etc. with a technical discussion of angels guarding the ark of the covenant. Compare this to William Norton's 1403 bid to classify ark styles, based on Nicholas's work. Here is one of the Urb.lat.14 images:
  17. Urb.lat.18, Peter Lombard
  18. Urb.lat.39, Ambrose of Milan, William of Canterbury, Prosper of Aquitaine
  19. Urb.lat.57, Jerome on Ezekiel
  20. Urb.lat.102, Venerable Bede,  Leo the Great,
  21. Urb.lat.103, Richard of St Victor, Hugh of St Victor including his heavenly hierarchy
  22. Urb.lat.136, Thomas Aquinas
  23. Urb.lat.140, Thomas Aquinas
  24. Urb.lat.157, Innocent IV, decretals
  25. Urb.lat.158, Azo of Bologna, decretals
  26. Urb.lat.160, Johannes Andreae, Boniface VIII, decretals dealing with marriage and other legal issues (see above)
  27. Urb.lat.198,
  28. Urb.lat.202,
  29. Urb.lat.205, Aristotle, 16th century
  30. Urb.lat.206, Thomas Aquinas on Aristotle
  31. Urb.lat.213, Thomas Aquinas on Aristotle
  32. Urb.lat.214, Thomas Aquinas and Robert Kilwardby (?)
  33. Urb.lat.215, Thomas Aquinas and Pseudo-Augustine
  34. Urb.lat.225, Pontanus Jovianus
  35. Urb.lat.229, Leon Battista Alberti
  36. Urb.lat.230, Egidius de Columna, Thomas Aquinas
  37. Urb.lat.231, Fabius Albergatus on the republic
  38. Urb.lat.246, health (urine), astrology, some by Abu-Bakr Razi
  39. Urb.lat.250, De plantis, De causis plantarum: a mid-15th-century manuscript of the works of Aristotle's pupil Theophrastus, originally owned by Pope Nicholas V (1397-1455) to whom the manuscript is dedicated on fol. 2r.: see the SLU catalog and the Rome Reborn catalog note, where Grafton points out these were both an important source of information and a stimulus to further contributions to knowledge, but notes that "despite its handsome title page, this volume contains no illustrations intended to help understandings of its scientific content."
  40. Urb.lat.256,
  41. Urb.lat.258,
  42. Urb.lat.259,
  43. Urb.lat.263,
  44. Urb.lat.268,
  45. Urb.lat.269,
  46. Urb.lat.271,
  47. Urb.lat.279,
  48. Urb.lat.292, Fibonacci, geometry, with lots of marginal figures
  49. Urb.lat.297, various; grammar, Plutarch
  50. Urb.lat.595,
  51. Urb.lat.1418,
  52. Vat.ar.71, translations of Greek Christian works into Arabic, dated 885 CE
  53. Vat.ebr.125,
  54. Vat.ebr.263,
  55. Vat.lat.97, Peter Lombard, Commentary on Psalms
  56. Vat.lat.128, 12th-century, commentary on Mark
  57. Vat.lat.152, 13th-century commentary on Catholic Epistles
  58. Vat.lat.167, Nicholas of Lyra on Four Gospels, dated 1482
  59. Vat.lat.184, Lilius Tifernas
  60. Vat.lat.198, Cyprian of Carthage, 15th century
  61. Vat.lat.199, ditto
  62. Vat.lat.200, ditto
  63. Vat.lat.294, Ambrose of Milan, De officiis ministrorum libri I-III.
  64. Vat.lat.297,Ambrose, De excessu fratris sui Satyri
Please use the comments box to contribute more details. Follow me on Twitter (@JBPiggin) for more news on Rome manuscripts. [This is Piggin's Unofficial List 30.]

Schadt, Hermann. Die Darstellungen der Arbores Consanguinitatis und der Arbores Affinitatis: Bildschemata in juristischen Handschriften. Tübingen [Germany]: Wasmuth, 1982.
Piggin, Jean-Baptiste. The Missing Manual: Schadt's Arbores. Academia.edu, 2015.

2015-11-11

Erlangen Tree

Until recently, a celebrated 12th-century manuscript, variously known as the Chronicle of Frutolf or the Chronicle of Ekkehard of Aura (Erlangen, Universitätsbibliothek, ms 406), was not to be found online. On November 7, German archives blogger Klaus Graf published the news on his site of its arrival and within a matter of hours, my Twitter colleague Pierre Chambert-Protat (@chaprot) went online to alert me to it. Digital social media are a wonderful boon to scholarship.

On November 4, I had published on this blog a schematic outline of a "tree" at folio 204v of the selfsame manuscript. This is a plot, which I originally prepared for my own book but later decided not to use:

This figure, drawn in 1140 or thereabouts, is adapted from the century-old Stemma of Cunigunde, a drawing made in or shortly after 1013 when Cunigunde was anointed Holy Roman Empress. You can examine a reconstruction of that stemma on my website.

What does it show? The most important person here is R - Charlemagne - whose empire was divided among three of his grandsons by the Treaty of Verdun.

To enhance the chronicle, Ekkehard (or his predecessor editor Frutolf) repurposed the old diagram as a study in saintly ancestry by adding to it images of Arnulph and his holy mother Begga. Other manuscripts of the Ekkehard Chronicle present the Stemma of Cunigunde more or less faithfully, but the scribe-artist of the Erlangen codex decided to have some fun with it. He inverted it, and drew the figure of Arnulph at the left and Arnulph's saintly mother Begga at right. The bottom roundel (A in my plot) represents Arnulph.

Curiously, this artist omitted Cunigunde, although she had been the motive for creating the original drawing and she was revered in the entire Bamberg area, where this miniature was almost certainly made, as a holy figure and foundress of the cathedral. One must at least consider the possibility that the stemma was inverted in order to conceal her deliberate exclusion.

You can now enjoy the original at fol. 204v of the digital surrogate: 

What change in medieval culture had made this startling inversion of the stemma not just possible, but acceptable to the customer, probably the Cistercian Monastery of Heilsbronn in Germany which became the long-term owner of this codex? Is this quirky conversion on an artist's desk the precise moment when the family tree, later to become a prestigious badge of nobility, was invented?

As with all big questions, the answer is not a simple one. A long inquiry was conducted into these issues by Christiane Klapisch-Zuber. As a historian of Renaissance culture, she was curious about the roots of the craze from the 15th to the 19th centuries to depict European aristocratic genealogies by painting vast leafy trees where portraits of ancestors were pinned to a trunk and out onto the boughs. 

Researching her 2000 book, L'Ombre des Ancêtres, she cast far back into the medieval period, seeking precursors to those trees. This Heilsbronn tree of the late 12th century, as well as a couple of other painted trees made at roughly the same time at Weingarten, a monastery in the southwest of Germany, only dimly foreshadow the Renaissance craze. 

The Weingarten artist, working between the years 1185 and 1191, drew a leafy inverted stemma of the powerful Welf family with its most ancient known ancestor peeking out from inside the trunk at ground level, while a wide space was reserved in the crown of the foliage to be occupied by the Welfs' most illustrious offspring (by female descent), King Frederick Barbarossa. This is in Fulda, 100 D.11, folio 13v and is online. The other from Weingarten is now lost but an image of the tree was published by its owner, the collector and dealer Robert Forrer, in 1907. Unfortunately that book is not yet online. In Europe, it does not enter the public domain until 2018.

Klapisch-Zuber came, in effect, to the conclusion that it would involve an anachronism to call these drawings family trees or Stammbäume. There was no firm mental association between trees and the specific idea of ancestry yet.

The cultural change that took place in the 12th century with the rise of Gothic art was in fact much broader. Trees enjoyed a wide variety of uses in the graphic arts, ranging from trees of sevens as mnemonic devices to the tree manifestations of the Virga Jesse motif. Gothic cathedrals are in a certain sense trees of stone. This was what drove the experiments at Heilsbronn and Weingarten.

As I have already pointed out, inverted stemmata made to resemble trees with roots in soil are a rarity before the 16th century. It was 16th-century scholars like Scipione Ammirato who deserve the credit as the true originators of the family tree, not the medieval artists who created trees of ancestry more or less by fluke.

Forrer, Robert, ed. Unedierte Miniaturen, Federzeichnungen u. Initialen des Mittelalters. Strasbourg: Elsässische Druckerei, 1907.
Klapisch-Zuber, Christiane. L’ombre Des Ancêtres. Paris: Fayard, 2000.

2015-11-04

Digita Vaticana Exceeds 3,000

Digita Vaticana, the manuscript digitization programme at the Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana (BAV) in Rome, exceeded 3,000 items on its main index page on November 3, 2015, meaning that it is now the biggest digitization program in Italy, having overtaken the Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana in Florence, where the Teca Digitale stalled at 3,000 after using up its grant four or five years ago.

I posted back in May with some metrics, when the BAV program passed the 2,000 point, and will not repeat the main points I made then about double-counting. They still stand and are worth rereading.

Comparing this achievement with other major European programs is not easy. To simplify, I will use numbers for documents created before the year 1600. The BAV tally under-represents its digital content, while including a whole swathe of 18th-century materials, particularly from the Capponi collection. Let us assume that these effects cancel one another out.

A blank search of Biblioteca Digital Hispanica pulls up a remarkable 10,008 pre-1600 hits. I hope somebody in Madrid is blogging about this, because BDH must have crashed through the 10,000 ribbon in the last few days and it deserves to spray around a few magnums of cava to celebrate.

Some probing two weeks back at Gallica in Paris returned a report that it held a whopping 14,975 documents from the same pre-1600 period, but this includes a huge number of single-sheet documents since Gallica scoops up not just library but archival material. I cannot see a way to filter their total for codices only.

A few weeks ago it was possible to get Germany's biggest digitization programme, at the MDZ in Munich to tell you via the search interface that it housed 3,700 pre-1600 manuscripts, but some officious engineer has spiked this. The national German search site, Manuscripta Mediaevalia, which has often been unreliable in the past, returns the number 4,748 if you search for digitized pre-1600 items. I suspect that is too low.

Then there is the excellent e-codices of Switzerland, with 1,404 manuscripts in high quality. They generously encourage you to download them. The British Library, which mean-mindedly thwarts downloading, claims almost 2,000 items digitized from among those curated by its ancient, medieval and early modern manuscripts section, judging by a blog post in late October.

Given these numbers, the BAV can now claim to be a serious player on a European scale. They still have a lot to fix, including poor quality control, a ridiculous watermarks policy and a precautionary copyright statement that hasn't been well thought through. But it's a good start. And remember, they still have 80,000 more items to come.
 
Here is the November 3 list of 76 items, plus the single item from last week, bringing the total to 3,003. This listing is going to be a work in progress, as I am busy with other things right now. If you can tell me what treasures the unmarked shelfmarks below represent, I will fill in the details later.
  1. Arch.Cap.S.Pietro.E.29,
  2. Arch.Cap.S.Pietro.H.19, a celebrated 10th-century codex of Terence, possibly made at Corbie and thought to derive from the even more famous Vatican Terence, Vat.lat.3838 (which is not yet online). Its illuminations include this shelf of masks on fol 10r.
  3. Arch.Cap.S.Pietro.H.25,
  4. Borg.copt.109.cass.III.fasc.6,
  5. Borg.copt.109.cass.III.fasc.7,
  6. Borg.copt.109.cass.VI.fasc.22,
  7. Borg.copt.109.cass.VI.fasc.22,
  8. Borg.copt.109.cass.X.fasc.30,
  9. Borg.copt.109.cass.XII.fasc.38,
  10. Borg.copt.109.cass.XII.fasc.39,
  11. Borg.copt.109.cass.XII.fasc.40,
  12. Borg.lat.338,
  13. Cappon.237.pt.B,
  14. Chig.M.VIII.164, (pseudo) Roberto Re di Ierusalem, Le Virtu Morali. The true author is apparently unknown, according to M. Dykmans.
  15. Pal.lat.50, the famed Codex Aureus of Lorsch, which was added to @DigitaVaticana Oct 26 though it had already been online in Heidelberg for a long time previously (I saw it there in the summer). Klaus Graf points out an extensive November 13 discussion (in German) of the digitization by Johannes Waldschütz.
  16. Pal.lat.60,
  17. Pal.lat.95,
  18. Pal.lat.142,
  19. Pal.lat.145,
  20. Pal.lat.149,
  21. Pal.lat.165,
  22. Pal.lat.204,
  23. Pal.lat.208,
  24. Pal.lat.212,
  25. Pal.lat.221,
  26. Pal.lat.222,
  27. Pal.lat.226,
  28. Pal.lat.259,
  29. Pal.lat.262,
  30. Pal.lat.265,
  31. Reg.lat.762,
  32. Sbath.235,
  33. Sbath.457,
  34. Urb.lat.45,
  35. Urb.lat.73,
  36. Urb.lat.129,
  37. Urb.lat.196,
  38. Urb.lat.212,
  39. Urb.lat.226,
  40. Urb.lat.228,
  41. Urb.lat.264, 1483, De re aedificatoria by Leon Battista Alberti (1404-1472). Grafton's Rome Reborn catalog notes, "This book offered a wealth of information, practical instruction, and aesthetic principles to the patrons and architects who would rear the city palaces, country villas, and domed churches of the 16th century." 'This copy has a magnificent trick on folio 1r where the artist pretends the paper has been punched through:
  42. Urb.lat.678 ,
  43. Vat.gr.2615,
  44. Vat.lat.19,
  45. Vat.lat.24,
  46. Vat.lat.43,
  47. Vat.lat.60,
  48. Vat.lat.63,
  49. Vat.lat.70,
  50. Vat.lat.94,
  51. Vat.lat.104,
  52. Vat.lat.113,
  53. Vat.lat.114,
  54. Vat.lat.117, glossed Four Gospels
  55. Vat.lat.125, glossed Gospel of Matthew (Anselm of Laon)
  56. Vat.lat.126, glossed Gospel of Matthew
  57. Vat.lat.130, glossed Gospel of Mark
  58. Vat.lat.142, glossed Epistles to Romans and Corinthians
  59. Vat.lat.145, Pauline Epistles with commentary
  60. Vat.lat.150, Pauline Epistles with commentary
  61. Vat.lat.166, Nicholas of Lyra, Postillae, 14th century
  62. Vat.lat.188, Irenaeus of Lyon, Against Heresies, dated 1576
  63. Vat.lat.189, Tertullian, various works, 15th century copy
  64. Vat.lat.225, Lactantius, Divinarum Institutionum
  65. Vat.lat.227, Tres Dialogi in Lactantium by Antonio da Rho, O.F.M., dating from about 1450. Grafton's Rome Reborn catalogue notes: "The humanists found many opponents among contemporary scholastics, one of whom was Antonio da Rho. Antonio tries to discredit the automatic humanist equation of earlier with better by showing that one of the early Christian writers, Lactantius had made numerous theological errors to which later scholastic writers had not been subject. This dedication copy for Pope Eugene IV has a colorful decorative border with a miniature showing the Franciscan friar presenting his work to the pope."
  66. Vat.lat.261, Athanasius
  67. Vat.lat.262,15th century, mainly Prosper of Aquitaine
  68. Vat.lat.350, Epistula
  69. Vat.lat.353, Renaissance manuscript of Jerome's letters to Paulinus, illuminated capitals
  70. Vat.lat.378, theological, mainly Venerable Bede
  71. Vat.lat.397, John Chrysostom, 15th century
  72. Vat.lat.398, John Chrysostom, Homilies on Epistle to Hebrews
  73. Vat.lat.1286, 15th century sermons
  74. Vat.lat.3197, Pietro Bembo's Dante: Divine Comedy
  75. Vat.lat.3834, 9th-century theological miscellany
  76. Vat.lat.7566, Dante's Inferno, scribe Bartolomeo da Colle 1421-84
  77. Vat.lat.14189, Pietro Bembo? miscellaneous letters
If you have any corrections, please use the comments box below. follow me on Twitter (@JBPiggin) for more news. [This is Piggin's Unofficial List 29.]

2015-11-03

Oldest Family Tree

As part of my book research, I am searching for the oldest family tree. Some time in the 16th century, the idea of dressing up the genealogies of royal and noble families to look like oak trees took hold in Europe. These were printed from copper engravings and could be distributed to regional leaderships as a kind of corporate branding and loyalty-building exercise.

As an entrepreneurial venture, this could be profitable. Scipione Ammirato, the Italian writer and historian, set up a workshop in Florence and turned out a whole series of them in cooperation with artist-engravers (Congedo, 216). On spec, he sent a family tree of Henry III to the French royal court. He received a reward of 500 gold ducats from Paris for it (Congedo, 274).

The oldest of Ammirato's trees is probably that of the Hapsburgs of Austria, engraved in 1576. It shows the tree on a high hill over a bay (probably representing Trieste) where a great naval fleet rides at anchor. The original copper plate still exists in Florence, according to the Italian register of cultural heritage, though it is not stated who owns it. An original print from it was sold by the antiquarian bookseller Gonnelli a few years ago as part of a set for 300 euros:

The type continues with Ammirato's 1580 book Delle Famiglie Nobili Napoletane. which contains eight double-page and five single-page engraved illustrations of genealogical trees. Each contains some kind of landscape in the background that can be connected with the dynasty. Here is my plot of part of the tree of Marzani, who were big shots in the Spanish-ruled Kingdom of Naples, from that book:
Now I must hasten to say that what I am looking for here is the earliest example of a thing named "family tree" or "albero genealogico" or "Stammbaum" or "arbre de famille".

We know from the great study by Christiane Klapisch-Zuber that these things had unwitting precursors in previous centuries. There were even 12th-century artists who took pre-existing stemmata and flipped them upside down to depict them as trees. A celebrated example, now at Erlangen (Universitätsbibliothek ms 406, fol. 204v), is found in one of the manuscripts of the Chronicle of Ekkehard of Aura:
But these were experiments or flukes, not genealogical trees as a general cultural phenomenon.

The conscious idea of presenting a complete family line connected by a woody trunk first shows up in southern German woodcuts in the late 15th century. [Later note: Dr Volker Bauer (see below) has kindly pointed out a magnificent early example in BSB incunable 2 Inc.s.a. 1264 from 1475-78 digitized here (seek image 18) and also at the LOC. There is also a most remarkable tree of heraldic arms in the 1492 Cronecken der Sassen, GW 4963.] This phenomenon reaches its finest flower in the Ehrenpforte engraved in 1515 by Albrecht Dürer (there's a fine reconstruction of this on Virtuelles Kupferstichkabinett). But Dürer's has no branches.

The tree as a recognizable category of art, a product where artist and customer know what to expect, only shows up later in the sixteenth century. It looks semi-natural, has a bottom root and clearly tiered generations. The oldest example I can find is Robert Peril's 1535 tree of the Hapsburgs made at Antwerp (lower half online: Boijmans Collection).

Examples later than Ammirato's include a fine 1586 tree of the Kings of Saxony by Lorenz Faust which is labelled "Stammbaum," perhaps the first documented use of that word in the German language (the link is to the MDZ in Munich). [Later: Note however a 1515 illustration title "Bawm vnnd Außlegung der Sypschafft ..." here.] The type's later development in Germany and embrace of tree shapes other than oaks has been researched by Volker Bauer of the Herzog August Bibliothek.

But I cannot find any trees of living families from the first third of the 16th century. Has anyone got suggestions?

Ammirato, Scipione. Delle Famiglie Nobili Napoletane. Firenze: Appresso Giorgio Marescotti, 1580. https://archive.org/details/gri_33125013895186.
Bauer, Volker. “Attesting to Dynasty: The Use of Images in Early Modern German Genealogy.” Rome, 2013. http://crhipa.upmf-grenoble.fr/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Bauer.pdf.
———. “Dynastic Botany: Banyans, Cedars, and Palms as Visual Models in Seventeenth-Century Genealogy.” In Visual-Acuity-and-the-Arts-of-Communication-in-Early-Modern-Germany, edited by Jeffrey Chipps Smith. Ashgate, 2014. https://www.ashgate.com/pdf/SamplePages/Visual-Acuity-and-the-Arts-of-Communication-in-Early-Modern-Germany-Intro.pdf.
Congedo, Umberto. La vita e le opere di Scipione Ammirato (notizie e ricerche). V. Vecchi, 1904. http://archive.org/details/lavitaeleopered00conggoog.
Klapisch-Zuber, Christiane. L’Ombre des Ancetres. Paris: Fayard, 2000.
———. “The Genesis of the Family Tree.” In I Tatti Studies. Essays in the Renaissance, 4:105–29. Florence: Leo Olschki, 1991.

2015-10-24

Poggio Portrait

The great Poggio Bracciolini (1380-1459) is famed for rediscovering a large number of classical Latin manuscripts that were decaying in German, Swiss, and French monastic libraries. The latest bunch of uploads at Digita Vaticana, on October 21, 2015, includes a manuscript, Urb.lat.224, made in his lifetime (but not by his pen) of his literary work De varietate fortunae (1447).

This is a first-hand survey of the ruins of Rome which Poggio had plenty of time to write as the chief papal scribe (alas he  made no drawings or maps). This codex, apparently made about 1450, begins with an image of Poggio in his sixties, which is probably from a portrait from life. Poggio had waited until age 56 to marry, wedding a girl not yet 18, Selvaggia dei Buondelmonti. He was not handsome, but he was one of the great intellectuals of his day in Florence.

His most celebrated find (described in Stephen Greenblatt's much over-rated best-seller The Swerve) was De rerum natura, the only surviving work by Lucretius.

Between 1414 and 1418 Poggio also dug up (and probably stole) in Fulda, Germany the De re rustica of Columella, an ancient handbook of farming written in the first century CE: a manuscript of De re rusticaUrb.lat.260, featured on this blog a few weeks ago. Columella's work had only been known of indirectly at that point through the Ruralia commoda, the most celebrated medieval handbook of farming. The latter book had been completed some time between 1304 and 1309 by Pietro de' Crescenzi, who could only find fragments of the ancient work. I mention this, because a manuscript of the Ruralia, dated 1424, Urb.lat.266, is in the current batch of uploads below.

Also in the new batch is a book by Poggio's Florentine mentor, Coluccio Salutati (1331-1406), De fato, fortuna et casu (written 1396-1399), here in a presentation edition that is almost certainly posthumous. Coluccio is one of my great heroes, since he purchased and preserved the only accurate copy, Plut. 20.54, of the sole large abstract diagram known from antiquity, the Great Stemma.

The full list of uploads follows:
  1. Arch.Cap.S.Pietro.D.184, Gospels with a fine illumination of Matthew (below)
  2. Arch.Cap.S.Pietro.D.201, Nicholas of Lyra, Postillae
  3. Arch.Cap.S.Pietro.E.12, liturgical calendar
  4. Arch.Cap.S.Pietro.E.21, De excidio urbis Hierosolymitanae (On the ruin of the city of Jerusalem) by Pseudo-Hegesippus (see the Roger Pearse summary on Pseudo-Hegesippus with rough translation)
  5. Arch.Cap.S.Pietro.F.11.pt.B, the blackened flyleaf of liturgical codex Arch.Cap.S.Pietro.F.11 which contains music and prayers for votive and other masses
  6. Arch.Cap.S.Pietro.I.6, 1781 catalogue
  7. Barb.lat.1396, a consilium of Baldus de Ubaldis
  8. Barb.lat.1808, collection of orations
  9. Borgh.286, Geoffrey of Trani, 1245? Summa super rubricis decretalium
  10. Borgh.295, Peter Lombard, Sententiae
  11. Borgh.296, theological and philosophical miscellany
  12. Borgh.336, Iacobus de Voragine, c.1229-1298, Sermones de sanctis, 16th century
  13. Borgh.378, 18th-century catalog of Borghesiani Library, Pars altera.
  14. Cappon.44, estates list? 1648
  15. Cappon.72,  notes from Avicenna
  16. Cappon.76, Italian translation of Quinto Curcio Rufo
  17. Cappon.237.pt.A, collection of 16th and 17th-century drawings and watercolours, including this sketch from 25v
  18. Chig.L.VI.212, Dante, Divine Comedy
  19. Ott.lat.2863, Dante, Divine Comedy
  20. Urb.lat.41, Ambrose of Milan, various, 15th century
  21. Urb.lat.82, Augustine, Prosperus, Vigilius, 15th century
  22. Urb.lat.86, Aymon of Halberstadt on Pauline Epistles, 15th century
  23. Urb.lat.124, Alexander of Ales, OFM, 15th century
  24. Urb.lat.128, Thomas Aquinas, 15th century
  25. Urb.lat.131, Thomas Aquinas, 15th century, copy owned by Pius VI
  26. Urb.lat.135, Thomas Aquinas, 15th century
  27. Urb.lat.138, Thomas Aquinas, dated 1474
  28. Urb.lat.141, Bonaventure, 15th century (Urb. lat. Catalog on Archive.org)
  29. Urb.lat.145, Antoninius of Florence, Summa, 15th century, copy owned by Alexander VII
  30. Urb.lat.153, Pelagius, dated 1482
  31. Urb.lat.201, Coluccio Salutati, De Fato, Fortuna et Casu, 15th century
  32. Urb.lat.216, Aristotle, Metaphysics, with commentary by Thomas Aquinas, 14th-15th century
  33. Urb.lat.217, ditto, 15th century
  34. Urb.lat.224, De varietate fortunae (1447) by Poggio Bracciolini (image above), a detailed first-hand survey of Rome's ruins, which was an exhibit in Rome Reborn. Also various orations by Poggio. See the detailed listing of the codex's contents at Saint Louis, plus the Latin Catalog on Archive.org. Apparently made about 1450.
  35. Urb.lat.235, Galenius and Thomas Aquinas, 16th century
  36. Urb.lat.255, technical handbook on brakes for horse-drawn vehicles, 17th century:
  37. Urb.lat.266, Pietro de' Crescenzi, a key medieval handbook on agriculture, Ruralia commoda, this copy dated 1424 lacks illuminations
  38. Vat.gr.2421, 1647, on paper, no entry yet in Pinakes
  39. Vat.lat.257, Ephrem the Syrian, 15th century
  40. Vat.lat.338, Venerable Bede on Esdras, Nehemiah, Tobit, 15th century
  41. Vat.lat.10678, Dante Divine Comedy with copious additions on margins of first 15 folios

Here is the evangelist Matthew at work from Arch.Cap.S.Pietro.D.184
This raises the posted number of manuscripts to 2,926, an increase of 41. As I noted recently, the presence of some digitized manuscripts is not declared in the Digita Vaticana index of postings, so the true total of digitizations is actually somewhat higher.

Follow me on Twitter (@JBPiggin) for more news. Post comments or correction in the box below this blog post.  [This is Piggin's Unofficial List 28.]

2015-10-13

Imaginary Jerusalem

Elements of the medieval world were far geekier than even today's Lord of the Rings cosplayers, Twilight pilgrims or Star Wars obsessives. The imaginary Jerusalem of Nicholas of Lyra, with its maps and building plans of places that never existed, made the writer's commentary on Ezekiel immensely popular in its day.

A fine 15th-century manuscript of Nicholas's Postillae has just come online at Digita Vaticana and you can feast your eyes on all these drawings. The codex is Urb.lat.15 and among its elaborate drawings is the sanctuary with east and west entrances and the altare holocaust site in the temple at folio 201v:
There's a fine Renaissance palace imagined in Jerusalem at folio 198r
Look through the book and you will find all sorts of oddities. Here's Antiochus II, given the epithet Theos, and his successive wives Laodice and Berenice in a not entirely reliable family tree at folio 259r. Observe how this top-down stemma has got little roots growing at the bottom. Very odd.
The origins of the diagrams are discussed in a 2012 paper by Lesley Smith.

Also new online in the batch of just two items uploaded October 12, 2015 is Borg.copt.65.

As always, if you can add notes, use the comments box below. Follow me on Twitter (@JBPiggin) for more news. [This is Piggin's Unofficial List 27.]